Joy to the world!

Sing along everyone...

"Joy to the world
the Liberals fell
I hope they rot in ...."



Whoa!... that was not very Christian of me. Actually, what I do hope is their deluded ideals rot with their defeat. Any predictions?

I have 2 possible scenario's.

1.) Like the previous elections we could have a vote split only this time coming from the left instead of the right. The Progressive Conservatives and the Canadian Alliance are no longer competing against one another and have united.

On the other hand you have 2 very socialist (read into it, communistic) left leaning parties in the NDP and Liberals. Some would suggest that the Liberals would steal most of the left vote, however, I would not hold my breath on that one. Many Liberal voters are not impressed with the outcome of the Gomery findings which found the Liberal party of Canada GUILTY as charged (wait a minute, we don't charge MP's, we just pat them on the bum and tell them to smarten up!)...anyways, guilty nonetheless of corruption.

Many Liberal supporters were also vehemently opposed to same sex marriage (bill C-38) and vowed not to support the Liberals in the upcoming election over that one issue. Since they may not feel inclined to vote for intergrity in government, such as the Conservatives are offering, and instead choose to believe media bias slander how Stephen Harper is satan incarnate (blah, blah, blah...same old rhetoric that eastern idiots fall for everytime) they would most likely cast their vote with the NDP or maybe even the Green party. This would open up the door to make some gains for the Conservative party in Ontairio. The Liberals are pretty much a write off in Quebec.

This would allow for a possible minority or even slim majority for the Conservatives. That's right folks, you read it here first. I am predicting a Conservative government.

However, my OTHER prediction may also come to pass as well.

2.) The reason I am called intolerant is because I will call a spade a spade. So let's lay it out.

The Atlantic provinces like working on their lobster boats for only 3 months out of the year and getting paid by the Liberals to sit around for the other nine months. Why would they bite the hands that feed. Their vote is bought and paid for by you the taxpayer.

Ontairio, these are the real scary people. I am almost convinced that these people have been lobotmized and had little Liberal microchips implanted into what is left of their brains. These microchips are set to trigger brain impulses that go off everytime the Liberal record of mismangement, waste, scandal, and corruption is brought up. Paul Martin sits in 24 Sussex drive and hits his little remote device and everyone in Ontario all of the sudden tunes into this radio message being transmitted that sounds a little something like this:



"This is Paul Martin...Stephen Harper is a bad man...he is satan...he has a dark hidden agenda...he will screw you worse then we do already...don't focus on billion dollar boondoggle...don't focus on useless 2 billion dollar gun registry...don't focus on government kickbacks to faithful party supporters...don't focus on adscam...don't focus on culture of entitlement...don't focus on health care ( we are going to privatize it anyway and blame the Conservatives)...don't focus on our depleted military...don't focus on ethics in government (we're not sure what that is)...please, don't focus on the sponsorship scandal, we promise to clean up government corruption for real this time, we really do mean it, please vote Paul Martin...Stephen is a bad man...he is dark and evil...better the devil you know because nobody mistreats the way we do...bad, bad, bad Stephen!!!

Although I pray for outcome #1 if Ontairio is as stupid and as gulliable as they are known to be when it comes to predictable voting patterns, then unfortunatley prediction #2 instead will come to pass where we will most likely see another Liberal minority.

My other fear for my country will then most likely become a reality...leading into my third and final prediction. The rise of a powerful western seperatist movement. Don't believe it?


(official logo of the WESTERN BLOCK PARTY)

Look at the rise Liberals have given to Quebec seperatism by their decietful treatment and behaviour. When it comes to the west...never say never. Until next time...

Canada...home of the red, white, and racist!

For those of you who have faithfully followed my entry's onto this sight you may recall my posting of September 19, 2005 titled "Multiculturaism - The new human segregation".

One of the points I was trying to establish in that particular entry was how, in order to stem the tide of racism, we in effect have reversed it. By going out of our way as a society to point out everybodies "differences" whether it be by skin color or cultural background we ended up far away from the original goal of equality regardless of ethinic background.

Remember the purpose? To offer EVERYONE fair and equal treatment. For those of you who may have thought I was a little off my rocker with that particular entry of September 19, then consider the following editorial written in today's Winnipeg Sun. It not only backs my original point, it sums it up.


************************************************************************************

Winnipeg Sun, November 25, 2005

How lovely that it only took three days worth of public backlash for the federal Public Works Department to rescind an utterly racist and discriminatory hiring policy that would have seen the department only hire, well, anyone but able-bodied white men for the next several months.

"It was misconstrued by some as being non-inclusive and this was not the intention," said a spokesman earlier this week. "So as a result of the concern expressed in this regard, the department is rescinding this special measure."

So that's that, right? Hardly.

Because this is neither a new policy nor one limited to Public Works. Last February, it was the Correctional Service of Canada that was under the hot lights when it came out that the department was throwing out all job applications not from aboriginal or visible-minority candidates.

At the time, we searched the Government of Canada's job site and found a number of other positions all over the government where one's gender, disability and skin colour were the primary factors in being hired by Ottawa. And the common denominator remained that white men need not apply for many government jobs.

Now, even though Public Works has publicly backed off its discriminatory hiring policy, other departments still quietly engage in the same kind of racism the Liberal government would instantly denounce if a big private-sector company announced it would choose its employees by skin colour.

The Environment Department, for instance, has been advertising for a "regional environmental effects monitoring co-ordinator" in Alberta.

The job pays more than $66,388 a year and the ad notes: "This position will be staffed through Environment Canada's employment equity program ... only members of a visible minority group will be considered."

Ditto for the web and graphic designer job being advertised by the Canadian Grain Commission in Winnipeg: Only visible minorities may apply.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans is looking for fishery officer trainees -- and "candidates must clearly self-identify as belonging to one of these groups ... aboriginal persons, visible minorities and women."

It appears that nothing has changed with Correctional Service of Canada, either, as it's seeking parole officers in B.C. who "self-identify" as an "aboriginal person, visible minority or a person with a disability."

"ALL THIS FROM A GOVERNMENT QUICK TO BRAG ABOUT CANADA'S TOLERANCE AND DIVERSITY."

Unless you're an able-bodied white male wanting a government job, that is. Then you're not tolerated in Ottawa.

************************************************************************************

So there you have it folks. I was once in denial about it but it in fact is true. Racism is definetly alive and well in Canada.

It sure is nice to see the high level of "tolerance" on behalf of Paul Martin and his merry band of corrupt, and now racist, Liberals. Thanks Paul, it's comforting to know someone of your (ahem!) calibur is running the show. For that allow me to award you...well, the highest medal you are worthy of recieving. On behalf of all Canadians!



The sad reality of it all is he will probably wear it with pride. Until next time...

It doesn't take a genius!

"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer (19th century German philosopher)

Imagine yourself admiring that masterpiece painting. That work of art and asking the obvious question, "Who created such a classical portrait?"

Or maybe your tastes center around fashion. "Who designed that awesome looking evening gown?"

Cars perhaps, "Who came up with the idea for the new look of the 2006 Corvette?"

Whatever your flavour notice one thing these questions all have in common. "WHO" designed, created, and came up with the idea. The question demands to know what brains are behind the design. It is a natural, typical, and common question for anyone of us and we have all asked it at one time or another and will continue to do so thru out our life time's.

Now imagine the frustration you would encounter if, when you ask these very simple questions of curosity, you were given one of the most asine answers there can possibly be. "It just happened over time."

"What? That makes no sense!" you may say.

"No, really!" comes the reply,"that painting your admiring there actually has no intelligence behind the design of it. One day a puddle of paints were all mixed together and as time went on they began to seperate themselves over this fallen tree that had flattened itself out into a canvass. (again, over time). The tree formed a flat enough surface that the paints eventually began to evolve into their own distinctive colors. As they grew and evolved they matured into the shapes you see on the canvass forming a beautiful picture."

"Did you actually see this phenomal metamorphasis take place?" you ask.

"Well uh no, not exactly..." comes the response.

"Then how do you know?" you ask. " I am sorry but this portrait just has far too much creativity and intricate design to have JUST HAPPENED! Somebody had to have created this magnificent work of art! It is simply far to complex, mysterious and awe inspiring to have just happened!" You finish up exasperated.

You would most likely walk away from someone who responded in such a manner perplexed by the absolute denial and idiocy of their statement. TELL THE TRUTH! Of course you would. This is how the believer of the theory of evolution sounds. Take important notice of two things in that last statement. First, you must be a "believer" in evolution. Second, it is ONLY a theory. Although it is taught in educational (snort!, snicker!) institutions like it is an actual fact we must always bear in mind that not one single person ever witnessed this so-called process of mutation take place.

In fact, the theory, and the believers/followers of it, are a religion unto themeselves. After all, religion is about having faith, is it not? Evolution would have us believe that the human race was spawned from monkeys. There is no answer as to why "some" monkeys have not evovled but that does not really matter. What matters is this whole mutation process that evolutionists build their case on. It is one that has quickly begun to fall apart over the last decade with discoveries of DNA and Genomes. According to science, monkey genomes began to mutate and eventually man began to evolve from this process over a period of 600,000 years. A guess of course, because once again, nobody actually witnessed it happen. The problem, today, with this argument is that science has now tampered with mutating the different genomes. What science has discovered is that every time a species genome was altered in any way by about .000,000,000,1 (that is one billionth of one percent) the mutated gene ALWAYS, (100%) of the time, died. The genome difference between a man and his closest living relative (gag!) the chimpanzee had a genome rating difference of 1.8%. When you compare that with a billionth of one percent, that number difference is astronomical.

That is just the very tip of the evolution iceberg that is starting to fall apart. So why are people so quick to accept a flawed theory over a creative God? I believe it boils down to people who don't want to accept accountability to a deity. Those who do chase after this belief system don't realise just how religious they are. They will venhemently defend it by going as far as twisting and distorting scientific facts to suit and justify what they believe.

With all the holes in this theory continuing to grow bigger by the day I have begun to realise that it takes far more faith to believe in evolution then it does to believe in God!

Just who is the founder/god of this particular faith movement? He goes by the name of Charles Darwin. If this is the god the rest of the world wants...



Looking like that they can have him! If that is what awaits them in the afterlife....Oh wait! I forgot they don't believe in that. What a way to live. Buying into the religion of evolution so you can spend the rest of your life looking forward to nothing. I think I'll pass. Evidence of creation is just far too obvious to me. Until next time...

Don't forget Canada...TO FORGET!

With a another Canadian election on the horizon I have decided to give those liberal minded voters a glimpse into the real world of politics. Since their small minds do not allow them to "read between the lines" I have decided to do it for them.

The following is a satirical look into what is REALLY being said when a Liberal speaks. Although the dialogue itself is a parody the content is so close to the reality it is downright scary that anyone actually supports these yahoos! Without further adue...

"Ladies and Gentleman, allow me to introduce to you the master of extortion, the King of corruption, and one of the greatest money launder's of our time...the less then honorable former Prime Minister, Jean Chretien!"



(phony applause) Jean Chretien:"Tank you, tank you veddy much. Eet iz grate too be ere wit chew tooday. Wit anudder eelection a round da corner I know dat da peepoll of Canaduh wheel be once again dere for da Liberal partee of Canaduh to poot uz back where we belong."

" I muss say dat az a former Prime Minister I wuz so grateful for da lack of memoree dat my fellow Canadianz ave. Moss governments would not have gottin pazz da first term in office after da billion dollarz boondoggle. Instead, you allowed uz tree more terms. Dis after da likes of da $2 billion dollarz gun registry, da tax on tax of gazzoleen, da guttin of our hellt care syztum (I ave a pryvate doctoor anywayz), and of courze da adscam scandal. A few million of your tax dollarz well spent for da cause of national unitee. OK a qaurter of a billion but zat iz nutting compared to what could ave been had we lost Qeebeck. Den whooz butt would we have to kizz?"

"I am zo glad you people are such imbeeseels when it comes to your patetic memoreez. I akchewallee fooled you back in ninety tree when I said dat I wood eeliminate da GST. Heh heh..I wuz juss joking you morons. But you still bought into it and put me into 24 Sussex. For dat I tank you as well. But letz not forgett how well I managed your munee Canaduh. While our mazzive militaree were off on one of deir manee pisskeeping missionz wit deir boken uh..uh..what do you call dem? Oh yeah, deir broken helleecopterz, I wuz able to fly around da world in my new challenger jetz and pretend to be on fact finding missionz. Tanks to your small brainz and even smaller memoreez, Canaduh, da Liberal partee can look forward to manee more yeerz in power."

Now allow me to introduece to you da fewture of Canaduh, dis is my brudder Mr. Ditherz. Das Paul for dose who don't know dat.



ann my udder brudder Mr. Ditherz #2. Das Jack, again, for dose who don't know.



Togedder deeze two wheel be unstoppable. Oh sure needer of dem can make up deir mind. One day Jack iz yelling and pointing fingerz at da corruption, den he propz da government up, den he goez back to akuzationz all over again. In dee end hee wheel crawl back into bed wit Paul. Dey are two of a kind. But daz OK beecauze I know dat no mattur how bad dey govern dey can still count on you support in da next eelection."

"In fact you shood ave seen da look on Paulz face whenI told im juzz how stoopeed da voterz of Canaduh are."



"Wedder da eelection eez called two day or nexx yeer, heee wheel still be da top dog. Tank you Canaduh for allowing dis government to soak you four azz long azz we ave. We hope to not let you down in da future. On voting day remember should you suddenlee ave a memoree of some of da tings dat have gone on wit da Liberals dat maybee you don't like. Maybee you want to vote for da conservateeves keep in dat pee brain mind of yourz dat dey are da ones wit da evil and dark hiddan agendaa. Remember, a voat for da Liberal partee is a vote for tyrannical dictatorship...uh...uh..I..uh..meen DEEMOCKRASEE! Soo juzz forget about da pazzt and look to da future. I tank you." (more phony applause)

So goes the world of Canada. When the time comes for accountability we can all count out Onatirio. For some reason they are content with continous lies, corupption, and deception. How unfourtunate and how predictable. Bring on the Western Block. Until next time...

When a man loves a woman

Who can find a virtuous and capable wife? She is worth more than precious rubies. Her husband can trust her, and she will greatly enrich his life. She will not hinder him but help him all her life.

She is clothed with strength and dignity, and she laughs with no fear of the future. When she speaks, her words are wise, and kindness is the rule when she gives instructions. She carefully watches all that goes on in her household and does not have to bear the consequences of laziness.

Her children stand and bless her. Her husband praises her: "There are many virtuous and capable women in the world, but you surpass them all!"

Charm is deceptive, and beauty does not last; but a woman who fears the LORD will be greatly praised. Reward her for all she has done. Let her deeds publicly declare her praise.

Proverbs 31:10-12, 25-31

These words from God's Holy Bible are a reflection of the most beautiful woman I know, that would be my wife. She is everything that today's secularized, liberated, decieved, and deluted women despise. Instead she epitomizes everything that women were originally designed for. She is a real and true woman. A woman who has discovered the true essence of love, family, and sacrifice. My wife realise's that love is not some "euphoric" feeling like when you first meet, but that it is an action. Love is not about "ME" it is about "YOU". It is about sacrifice.

When it came to the decision of having children my wife put any of her own personal dreams and ambitions aside to raise them in the home. Having children and paying someone else to raise them simply made no sense to either of us. Moments like baby's first step or first word were witnessed and shared with me by her, not the daycare worker/sitter. The children were always well rested, fed, and getting to know their parent more and more each day. Because of her role in the home we have a very close and complete family. Our children feel very secure and stable. On a number of occasion's where my wife would need a weekend getaway with some girlfriends, I would step into her role of feeding the kid's (usually take out because I burnt everything), cleaning(house & clothes), bathing and dressing the kid's (usually had to do this more then once a day, kid's can get messy real quick), grocery shopping (this was scary as I usually just got lost), and the numerous other task's that she would perform on a regular basis. She would do this daily for the last 10 years making it look so effortless. Yet leave me alone for a weekend and I was a walking disaster.

What was the cost for her to raise our children during those critical and impressionable years? (Remember, once they are gone, you can't have them back) A smaller home instead of 2,000 square feet of walls I do not really need? One 4 cylinder sedan instead of three gas guzzling SUV's just because...? A small beat up old Harley instead of the big old windbagger's? How about her dignity, self esteem, self worth, and feminity? She laughs at women who somehow feel they are robbed of these feminine qualities because raising their own children is supposed to be a sign of weakness. That a stay at home mom is "supposedly" unfufilled in her life. When I compare this to the immeasurable role and importance of how my children have turned out...there actually is no comparison at all. The cost is priceless. I am well pleased that my wife was there to share the memories not only with me but the kid's themselves. Never once has she ever uttered a word of regret but instead has always been very confident and fulfilled in her role in the home. She put our children and husband ahead of herself and today that Proverb rings true as my children stand and bless her and I as her husband praise her when I declare "There are many virtuous and capable women in the world, but you surpass them all!"

Because of this I FIRMLY believe that there is not a single career driven woman out there today who could hold a candle to my wife. NOT EVEN CLOSE!

Yet in today's western culture it has become ingrained into today's women (no I do not mean every single one of them) that a "true and successful" woman is somehow defined as being career oriented. She is the one wearing her power suit with briefcase in one hand while dropping baby/toddler off at daycare with a bottle of fake breast milk. She is simply "too busy" to give baby the required nutrients that naturally comes from the breast. In fact, so as not to incovience mom during birth, a ceasaran was planned ahead well in advance. It's then off to work for that all important career while somebody else get's paid to raise her children and instill their moral values and choice's in to their kid's rather then themselve's. By the time mom pick's up baby/toddler she is just too exhausted from giving herself to others all day that cooking a decent meal for the family is just not an option. It's either frozen quick fixes or take out, at least most of the time. Time for the kid's? What time? Mom doesn't usually walk in the door until 5:30/6:00pm. She is physically wiped, mentally stressed, and spiritually sucked out. The last thing she wants is to deal with kid's hopping on her lap. This usually causes a verbal blast towards them about mom needing some time to herself. The kid's crime...wanting to spend time with her and share their exciting moments of the day. After supper it is bath time, a short story, and off to bed so mom can have her down time to recoup in order to give all her energies to other people the following day.

Where is the time for a relationship with your own children when a life is lived like this? What about the husband? I can only assure you that all of her stresses are "his fault" even if they really are not. This is what society calls a "successful" woman?

If this is the world view of a successful woman they can have her. I prefer my God's version..she is written about in Proverbs 31. She is my wife. Until next time...

Do as I do, NOT as I say!

It is already common knowledge to those of you who peruse my venomous writings that I am no fan of Liberal party's, thinker's, or way of life. But they are not alone in their twisted, deceptive, and self righteous way of thinking. There is yet another deluded mindset out there. They are known as the NDP (Nasty Defecit Party or my other fave, the No Damn Plan party). They lay claim to be the supporter's of a healthy and clean enviorment and big proponents of the Kyoto Accord. You know the accord don't you? The one where Canada is supposed to control it's toxic emission's only apparently we are failing miserably at it. We have signed this accord with the understanding that those who fail to reach their mandatory emission control targets must pay a heavy fine. However, they are allowed to buy "credits" from other nations who have signed onto the Kyoto agreement. Here is where it get 's really interesting...the other countries signed onto this agreement will never have to pay a single penny into the coffer's pot even if they far exceed their emission's limit. This is because they are third world nation's and will not be subject to financial penalty. Canada is the only country that will have to pay into it! Make's perfect sense does it not? The NDP slammed the U.S. Government for not signing on to this ridiculous accord and yet the US is not only meeting but far exceeding their own pollution control expectations, which have far stronger demands then Kyoto, making Canada look like a bunch of fool's. But what do you expect from a party that has prostituted itself to the Liberals time and again. These (NDP) are people who show up to their own press conferences in their gas guzzling SUV's telling us we need to be more conservative in our fuel consumption.

Their most recent display of typical adopted Liberal hypocrisy, came in the form of the same sex (Bill C-38) vote back in June 2005. This same party, which has also laid claim that they are the great purveyors of human rights and democratic reform, clearly displayed how far from the truth that statement actually is when it came down to this particular vote. While continually pointing accusing finger's at the Liberal Party for it's constant "confidence voting" imposed upon the party faithful (i.e. vote my way or it's the highway) the NDP turned and did EXACTLY the same thing by forcing the hand of their own party faithful to vote ONLY in favour of the bill or face consequence's. Party leader Jack(ass) Layton claimed that same sex marriage was a human rights issue and, because his party was such BIG supporter's of human rights, NDP MP's must vote in favour or face severe reprimand.

The problem with his arguement is that it has never been a human rights issue. Homosexuals have always had the right to marry...provided it was a member of the opposite sex. However, the RIGHT still existed. There was never a need to re-define marriage. Homosexuals have, for many years, enjoyed the same benefits as hetrosexual couples. What the NDP managed to accomplish thru this ridiculous vote on re-definition was, essentially, to remove the rights of some(marriage commissioners, clergy, etc.) ignore the will of the majority(68%) of Canadians who did not want marriage tampered with, and give them to a minority group of people(gays and lesbians) who never lost their rights in the first place.

Now we have a party in the NDP who DENIED it's own party members to exercise their fundamental right to freedom of moral conscience, which is gauranteed under the Charter of Human rights and freedom, in the House of Commons. They also denied their MP's to democratically represent the will of their constiuents. With the exception being NDP MP Bev Desjarlais who recognized this act of anti-democracy and bravely defied her party leader instead choosing to represent the will of the people who put her in office. She has since been stripped of her portfolio and most recently lost the vote to represent the NDP in her riding in the upcoming election.

Let's not forget Liberals either, who called it a free vote and then forced their 72 cabinet ministers to vote in favour. Once again calling it a "vote of confidence" while maintaining to the Canadian public that it was a "free vote" What???? So much for representing the will of the people and exercising democratic reform in the House of Commons.

Combined, these two parties are downright scary. Liberals swore up and down 12 years ago that same sex benefits to gay couples would NEVER lead to re-defineing the institution of marriage and yet here we are today. And they did it without a mandate from the Canadian public!!! We have the NDP who are supporter's of terroist's (see Svend Robinson in Palestine defending Yassar Arafrat) defenders of grand larceny(again see Svend Robinson "pocketing" a $60,000 ring apparently because he was distraught over a hiking incident 7 years ago? Whatever.) and adversaries against keeping the Christ in Christmas(once again, see Svend Robinson)



So what's next for these two hammer and sickle pusher's? Right now there are men out there who claim to feel more like a woman on the inside but have no desire to "alter" themselves physically. Should we then re-define the term woman to "include" the male anatomy so as not to offend or ostracize these people? Sounds ridiculous doesn't it? So was re-defining marriage. Keep voting in the communist dicator's and it will become reality. Until next time...

I am not an animal!

Imagine, if you will, how exactly you would feel if someone approached you and justified your sexuality to the equivalent of an animal. I don't know about you but I personally would be down right insulted. Yet here we are in the day and age of forced acceptance and "postive" tolerance(what a joke) being brought down to that level. Back in the spring(2005) when the whole gay marriage issue was being force fed down the throats of Canadians I took notice of a number of editorials and letter's to the editor(of a number of newspapers) rationalizing why the homosexual lifestyle should be welcomed into the fold of marriage. In a typical display of liberal idiocy, those in favour of gay marriage with their infinite wisdom felt comparison's to the animal kingdom was justification enough to accept homosexuality as a normal sexual lifestyle. The rationalisation given was simply this "...because the animals do it." Wow, how profound. Although I am not a homosexual, and I will NEVER recognize a same-sex marriage as legitimate, I did feel insulted on behalf of the gay community that there are people out there who, in defense of homosexuals, would lower them to the standard of an animal! At least I still recognize them as part of the human race and treat them as such. What these defender's of "goodwill" do not realise is the pandora's box that they are opening when they make such dangerous comparison's. If we are to accept the homosexual lifestyle as "normal" because "the animals do it" then one has to be prepared for acceptance of all the animals sexual practises and adopt them as normal for human's as well. Not just homosexuality. If we parallel our sexuality with animals here's what we are in danger of saying is acceptable.
1.) Animals DO NOT ask for permission to have sex with their partner. If we apply the term"..because the animals do it" we then justify non consensual sex or rape as an acceptable sexual lifestyle.
2.) Some animals kill their mate during the act. Because the animals do it we must now accept necrophilia as a normal sexual lifestyle.
3.) Monkeys, for example, have sex with their own children when they are as young as 2 years old. Because the animals do it we now say that incest and pedophileia is also a normal, therefore, acceptable sexual lifestyle.
4.) Some animals will kill another male species and take his female companion. Because the animals do it we must now accept that it is OK for a man to murder another man so he can take his wife for himself.
Are you begining to get the picture? The human race should always hold itself to a higher standard. The reason some animals engage in homosexual activity (listen up you liberal moron's who don't do your homework) is because of over population. It has nothing to do with a strong urge to be with the same sex. It has everything to do with an internal clock inside that goes off during certain times of the year that says I must pro create RIGHT NOW! It is almost as if their body instinctively takes over because they are being told they need to "release" their seed. Is it normal for them to engage with another animal of the same sex? No, it is because that is what is available to them. Unlike human beings who can exert self control, they cannot. My final case in point is this...when your neighbour's pooch run's across the street to mount you and furiously begin's to hump your leg do you:
A) Say to your self "I think this is the begining of a beautiful thing" or...
B.) Say to yourself "This is just NOT NORMAL!"
Think about it! Until next time...

"...And Justice for All!"

"Justice Is Lost
Justice Is Raped
Justice Is Gone
Pulling Your Strings
Justice Is Done
Seeking No Truth
Winning Is All
Find it So Grim
So True
So Real"

James Hetfield, Metallica



For those who have not heard yet, Toronto resident and fitness physical expert David Carmichael, was found "Not criminally responsible" for the first degree murder of his 11 year old son, Ian. Was he guilty? Yes, the evidence not only pointed directly to him but he confessed to his crime. Yet he is still not responsible. Imagine that! You committ a heinous crime, you were aware of the act while you were committing it, and even though you are GUILTY you are just not responsible. Only in Canada! Where the perpetraitor's become victim's. Forsceneic psychopath's, I mean pyschiatrists, testified for both the Crown and Defence stating that he was suffering from a severe bout of depression. Yeah, that is too bad but how does this justify murdering your own child? According to Liberal appointed(that means un-elected) Ontario Superior Justice Helen Rady the rational(I.E. Justification for first degree murder) is because of Mr. Carmichaels disorder this "...rendered him incapable of knowing it was wrong." I consider the same line of reasoning every time I want to withhold paying any taxes but apparently there is no cop-out for that. I find it rather ironic that Judge Rady claim's that David was incapable of "...knowing it was wrong." when Dr. John Bradford of the Royal Ottawa Hospital testified that Carmichael believed killing Ian was the "morally right" thing to do because he thought the boy was growing increasingly violent and was going to stab his sister. Huh? If he didn't know right from wrong, as the judge seem's to think, then how could he possibly know or distinguish if ANYTHING at all was morally right? The intelligence of Judge Rady get's even better as she bellows out the rehearsed mantra chant of our (gag, puke!) justice system when she states (get ready, you have heard it all before) "I am satisfied that Mr. Carmichael poses no real threat to the public." Did you recognize that one. Judge Rady ends with "Indeed, Mr. Carmichael LIKELY poses more of a threat to himself than to the public." He likely? But the Judge is not exactly sure. I wonder if Ian would agree with her statement. It's amazing how Carmichael recalls everything about the night in question when he confessed to police how he gave Ian a mixture of sleeping pills with oranje juice, waited for him to fall asleep, then strangled him. Only he is not responsible because he was depressed. I get very depressed every time I am reminded that Paul Martin is still the Prime Minister but it certainly would not justify me taking a life now, would it? But, alas, this is justice in Canada. We are such a weak and tolerant society. What we cannot wake up to is the reality that justice and tolerance cannot co-exist. Otherwise we end up with numbbrained, deluded idiot's on a bench telling us we need to be more understanding of people like Dave Carmichael who premeditate the murder of their own children. To think our country has the gumption to condemn places like China for their inhumane treatment and violation of human rights against their own people while we coddle our own criminals for treating their victim's in the same manner. But that is typical Liberal hypocrisy in action. On the other hand, even if David was to be convicted of first degree murder, a charge carrying 25 years to life, this is afterall Canada where we apply the metric system to our sentence's. He would have been out in, oh..., probably 14 or 15, no let's be generous 18....days. Corrections Canada (Government of Canada) would not want to keep him in there too long because he would be taking up valuable space reserved for the real criminals of Canada. You know those hardened ones that try to get away without paying their taxes, or the prairie wheat farmer's caught selling their product over the border because their own Government wants to screw them with below rock bottom pricing, and of course the law abiding outdoorsman who did not register his hunting rifle. We all sleep better in this country knowing they are off the street. Until next time...

Stupid is as stupid does

Ahhh yes, the famous words of the renowned Forrest Gump. Amazing how this "simpleton" seemed to display more intelligence than the average lackey we call the Liberal supporter. Now before you get your knicker's in a knot at least hear me out on this. With a potential election looming closer and the Liberal party of Canada back at 40% in the polls it begs the question, "Just how stupid are those who vote Liberal?" Consider my following 16 point presentation. What I am about to present is a quick overview of the last decade of Liberal rule and ALL those things we pathetically complacent and apathetic Canadian's either forget or willfully bury our head's in the sand about. Keeping in mind all of you Paul Martin supporter's who are decieved into believing that Paul represent's a "New government", that he is the same indvidual who was responsible for co-authoring the now famous Liberal "Red book" thereby making him just as responsible for all the "Promise's made, promise's then denied" during the tyrannical reign of the evil dark lord Jean Chretien. If by the time you get to the end of this list you would still vote Liberal, then YES I question your mentality. Alright here we go:
1)The PROMISE to eliminate the GST. Still waiting.
2.)Accountability on the HRDC's billion dollar boondoggle. Still waiting.
3.) Promised to end child poverty by the year 2000. (In fact it is on the rise.) Still waiting.
4.) The two million dollar gun registry that has now ballooned to 2 BILLION dollars and counting. Allan Rock, Anne McCellan, and Paul Martin have never answered to or been able to justify this insane amount of money to Canadians. Nor have they accepted any responibility for allowing it to get where it is at today. Crime has continued to escalate not decrease as they promised. Still waiting.
5.) The promise to improve our health care system, a system that was finacially "gutted" by guess who? Yours truly Paul Martin. He has now PROMISED to fix the very problem that he created. Still waiting.
6.)Investment in our military...with 40 year old helicopters falling out of the sky, leaking firetraps for submarines, green combat fatigues for desert oriented operations, Tonka toys for jeeps, and the fact that we have to call the US President to fly our troops over seas and their equipment(how embarassing) I would say we are ...Still waiting.
7.) National daycare program(not that we need one), they have been promising that one for 12 years during every pre-election campaign. Still waiting.
8.) How about one of the classic's from three years ago when Stockwell Day stood up in parliament with the Liberal red book and read from the section that promised to appoint an independent ethics commissioner to the house. Stockwell said he and the Opposition fully agreed with the Liberals and motioned to implement this red book promise. Paul martin was one of the first ministers to stand up and vote AGAINST his own promise. So now we are...Still waiting.
9.)The promise to protect and uphold the traditional definition of marriage. Paul claims a sudden change of heart after talking with a friend's daughter who is gay. That sounds an awful lot like Jean Chretien's BS story about his "homeless buddy". For the record, Paul Martin was given NO mandate by the Canadian people to redefine marrige. Bill C-38 translated is FORCED ACCEPTANCE upon the will of the people when poll after poll suggested that almost 70% of Canadian's were opposed to redefining marriage.
10.) Another classic from last year, Paul Martin's PROMISE to get to the bottom of the sponsorship scandal because he was "mad as hell" and that no election would be called until the Gomery commission had completed it's mandate. He then shut down the commission and called an election. Today we are still waiting.
11.)The Promise that same-sex marriage will not affect those with religious convictions because they are protected under the charter. Meanwhile Marriage commissioners(Manitoba, Saskatchewan) are being forced out of their jobs and clergy are being threatened with their tax charitable status being removed(Bishop Fred Henry, Calgary) if they speak out against the government's position on same sex marriage to their congregations. Paul's cowardly response..it's a provincial jurisdiction. So much for his precious charter.
12.) Gas taxes. Remember , by Paul's own admission, that for a period of at least three years not one single penny from gas taxes was invested in our crumbling highways. Was it paid back to us? No. Were we given a break when the price of fuel went up, considering our taxes were not going where they were supposed to any way? No. Where did the money collected go? Probably Quebec. Accountability on this issue? Still waiting.
13.) Now we have the infamous sponsorship scandal. Paul says "he knew nothing" even though he met with the accused (Alfonso Galigano and Chuck Guite) on a weekly basis. Keep in mind that he was not only the Minister of Finance but he was also the Vice-President of the Treasury Board. Guess what they do? Every dollar that is spent must first pass by their board for inquiry of what the funds are being requested for. After that it is up to the board to refuse or APPROVE funding but they will do neither until they have FULL KNOWLEDGE of what the money is for and where it is going. Paul Martin knew and know's all about the sponsorship scandal. He was a a part of it.
14.)Remember Paul Martin said that those responsible(for Adscam) "...would be punished severly". We just witnessed how severe it was recently when one of the infamous ad executive's, Paul Coffin, who was responsible for STEALING 1.5 million of your tax paying dollars ONLY had to pay back 1 million of it with no time in jail. If you the taxpayer owed the Federal Government as little as $150.00 in income tax but refused to pay it, you would do time in a Federal Penitentary on charges of tax evasion!
15.) Back to those gas taxes. With rapidly accelerating gas prices at the pumps due to hurricane's Katrina & Rita(yeah right...) Has your everloving Prime Minister done anything to ease the burden at the pump's? Let me demonstrate just how much he cares for his fellow Canadian's. Right now across the country there is a 1.5% tax on your fuel called the "Deficit reduction tax". The Liberals implemented this tax about 12 years ago to help wipe out the deficit and PROMISED to remove it once it was eliminated. NEWSFLASH!!!!! According to Paul Martin the deficit was eliminated...are you ready....8 YEARS AGO!!!! But he still cannot take his tight little fist's off our money. Not even when time's are tough.
16.) Let us also not forget(although if your Canadian, you probably will) his most recent promise to eliminate the "Democratic deficit". Back inthe spring (2005) Paul appointed a review committee, loaded with Liberals of course, to interview his losing candidate buddy Glen Murray for a top position in the Federal Government Enviormental Department. During the interview process, Glen Murray confessed to the committee he had very little knowledge of the position or the enviorment for that matter. With that information the committee refused his appointment. What did our democratically conscious Prime Minister do? He overrode the committee's decision and appointed Mr. Murray anyway. Atta boy Paul, very dictorial...uh I mean democratic of you.
This is the man Ontairo keep's putting back into power. Despite all the corruption of power, abuse, waste and mismangement of taxpayer dollars. These guy's make the Sopranoes look like a gentleman's club! Yet it's the same old tired position of the brainwashed out east.."What's the alternative?" they ask. How about taking a lesson from Quebec! That's right I said Quebec. Most Quebeceer's don't want seperation but they were willing to plug their noses on election day and vote for a seperatist party just to send the Liberals a powerful message that they don't approve of the way the Liberals are running, sorry ruining, the country. As sad as it is I must say the next election is already predictable. Despite a very dismal track record, one in which the Liberals cannot run a successful campaign on, they must then rely on the "peabrains" out east to fall for the all too predictable Liberal tactic...you know the one don't ya? The one where Paul Martin avoids all the above mentioned and tells you that the leader of the opposition is the boogey man. You easterner's, or ANY Liberal supporter for that matter, fall for it EVERYTIME. Stupid is as stupid does. Until next time...

Multiculturaism - The new human segregation

Why the big hype about multicultarism. Back when the use of the word became the "politically correct" term to use when discussing or promoting unity among various cultures that had come to live together under one nation in the same land, I must admit, the original INTENT behind this movement was very noble. But as I now look back over the last 20 years, what multicultarism set out to accomplish now appears to be heading in the opposite direction and plunging towards reverse discrimination. The original purpose of this movement was to end racial discrimination not reverse or throw it on to another ethnic group. Yet that is what appears to be happening. For example, in the world of sport's, we have The Latino game's..The African American games, or the more recent here in Canada..The North American Indegineous games. We have similar venues in the world of entertainment such as the Spanish actor's awards or the North American Black actor's awards. (Forgive me, some of the names of these events may not be word for word accurate) Most responses I recieve when I pose the question "Why so much emphasis on one particular race?" go something like this...."Well, I think it's great that these people get an oppurtunity to display how proud they are of their cultural background" Too which I might respond.." at the exclusion of other's? So we can point out how special our own group is? I thought we were to be united?"...To which the next response is usually "Well we are, but what is wrong with telling other's how much our particular culture has accomplished and achieved. What it has and can contribute to society. It instills pride back in our people and gives them self worth." My final response I am about to tell you actually took place between myself and very well educated and close Native American friend of mine...I made the following statement "So I guess it would be a good idea then to have the European Caucasian games as the next big cultural event" Too which they responded "Well, no!" "Why not ?" I asked. With their head now bowed slightly toward the ground and in a very admitting and sombering voice the reply came "Because...you would be labelled a racist" My point was made without rubbing it in. Multicultarism has caused more division between people by putting Black's in this corner, Native's in that corner, Chinese over here, East Indians over there. Once again, we totally managed to completely marginalize ourselves from one another. I cannot seem to get my head around how this is supposed to ease racial tensions. I wish that it would but I suspect it is having the opposite effect. In fact racism has now become prevelent in job application's. Recently a friend of mine applied for a Provincial Government job. He was almost immediately contacted as his qualifications were exceptional. According to him, the person on the other end of the phone could not wait to get him down for his interview. They only wanted to confirm something..."do you have your Metis or Treaty card?". " No" he told them. When they asked him why not he told them quite simply "Because I am not an Indian". He was told they would not be hiring him then. He pointed out to them that they JUST finished singing the praises of his application..."and now your not going to hire me because of the color of my skin?". "Sorry, the government has a mandate to hire so many Aboriginals to meet their qouta". How pathetically racist. We have not evolved or broken away from the bigoted views that were once held in decades past. We have gone from discriminating against one group of people and are now simply doing it to another. So much for uniting as human being's regardless of skin color or cultural background. Well, before I get labelled as a racist, I think I will take my Caucasian butt and go crawl into bed with my beautiful Cree Indian wife. We are both quite tired from our most excellent dinner visit with our very good, and very black, Nigerian friends. Until next time....

Who am I?

Who am I and why do I refer to myself as the intolerant one?

Good question.

My main reason is because I tend to hold alot of personal beliefs and views that fly directly in the face of mainstream society. I disagree with many views that most people might find acceptable. I do not disagree for the sake of arguement, I disagree because I simply cannot find logic in one's reasoning or view. I am, however, open minded enough to at least considering what a person has to say.

For example, I disagree with homosexual's being allowed to marry. It is an opinion that I am entitled to hold without fear of retribution. I have my reason's which I will most likely share another time.

However, there are those who would label me as "Intolerant" for exercising my fundamental right to freedom of moral conscience simply because I do not agree with them. Thereby displaying their own hypocrisy by demonstrating intolerance towards differing or opposing views. Heck, they even get into the name calling such as "bigot".

What really throws them off is when I let them in on one of my little secret's....I actually have some friends who are gay. I also think the belief in the evolution theory is absolutely ridiculous!

For the record, I was not raised in a religious home where creationism was taught, in fact far from it, so noone can lay claim as to my influence. The FACT(S) is that science can simply no longer support this absurd notion that we came from monkey's. What an insult to the human race.

Again, though, a topic for another blog(time).

I think Liberals are complete idiot's. Enough said on that topic for now.

Athesim...if your plane was about crash into the ground at 700 mile's per hour would you

A) sit silently still because , well, you don't believe in God or the hereafter anyways so you might as well sit back and recall the fondest moments of your life before impact or...

B) Do what instinctively comes naturally to man/woman and cry out to God "please save me!!!"

Athesim IS self deception/denial.

Next, the war in Iraq was necessary.

That ought to touch some nerve's. Actually the UN(useless nation's) should have dealt with that problem 12 years ago. Saddam had to go.. and NO the war is not about oil, do your homework and see where the US get's their oil from and where they will be in the future. Stop believing everything Michael Moore says..he's an idiot too.

Final topic of intolerance for now...practise safe sex "wear a condom". If a condom has an 18% failure rate (1 in 5) and can't protect you from herpe's, crabs, or fatal disease's such as HPV(Human papilloma virus) is it not just a LITTLE bit misleading to refer to it as "SAFE"?!!! Until next time.....