When a man loves a woman

Who can find a virtuous and capable wife? She is worth more than precious rubies. Her husband can trust her, and she will greatly enrich his life. She will not hinder him but help him all her life.

She is clothed with strength and dignity, and she laughs with no fear of the future. When she speaks, her words are wise, and kindness is the rule when she gives instructions. She carefully watches all that goes on in her household and does not have to bear the consequences of laziness.

Her children stand and bless her. Her husband praises her: "There are many virtuous and capable women in the world, but you surpass them all!"

Charm is deceptive, and beauty does not last; but a woman who fears the LORD will be greatly praised. Reward her for all she has done. Let her deeds publicly declare her praise.

Proverbs 31:10-12, 25-31

These words from God's Holy Bible are a reflection of the most beautiful woman I know, that would be my wife. She is everything that today's secularized, liberated, decieved, and deluted women despise. Instead she epitomizes everything that women were originally designed for. She is a real and true woman. A woman who has discovered the true essence of love, family, and sacrifice. My wife realise's that love is not some "euphoric" feeling like when you first meet, but that it is an action. Love is not about "ME" it is about "YOU". It is about sacrifice.

When it came to the decision of having children my wife put any of her own personal dreams and ambitions aside to raise them in the home. Having children and paying someone else to raise them simply made no sense to either of us. Moments like baby's first step or first word were witnessed and shared with me by her, not the daycare worker/sitter. The children were always well rested, fed, and getting to know their parent more and more each day. Because of her role in the home we have a very close and complete family. Our children feel very secure and stable. On a number of occasion's where my wife would need a weekend getaway with some girlfriends, I would step into her role of feeding the kid's (usually take out because I burnt everything), cleaning(house & clothes), bathing and dressing the kid's (usually had to do this more then once a day, kid's can get messy real quick), grocery shopping (this was scary as I usually just got lost), and the numerous other task's that she would perform on a regular basis. She would do this daily for the last 10 years making it look so effortless. Yet leave me alone for a weekend and I was a walking disaster.

What was the cost for her to raise our children during those critical and impressionable years? (Remember, once they are gone, you can't have them back) A smaller home instead of 2,000 square feet of walls I do not really need? One 4 cylinder sedan instead of three gas guzzling SUV's just because...? A small beat up old Harley instead of the big old windbagger's? How about her dignity, self esteem, self worth, and feminity? She laughs at women who somehow feel they are robbed of these feminine qualities because raising their own children is supposed to be a sign of weakness. That a stay at home mom is "supposedly" unfufilled in her life. When I compare this to the immeasurable role and importance of how my children have turned out...there actually is no comparison at all. The cost is priceless. I am well pleased that my wife was there to share the memories not only with me but the kid's themselves. Never once has she ever uttered a word of regret but instead has always been very confident and fulfilled in her role in the home. She put our children and husband ahead of herself and today that Proverb rings true as my children stand and bless her and I as her husband praise her when I declare "There are many virtuous and capable women in the world, but you surpass them all!"

Because of this I FIRMLY believe that there is not a single career driven woman out there today who could hold a candle to my wife. NOT EVEN CLOSE!

Yet in today's western culture it has become ingrained into today's women (no I do not mean every single one of them) that a "true and successful" woman is somehow defined as being career oriented. She is the one wearing her power suit with briefcase in one hand while dropping baby/toddler off at daycare with a bottle of fake breast milk. She is simply "too busy" to give baby the required nutrients that naturally comes from the breast. In fact, so as not to incovience mom during birth, a ceasaran was planned ahead well in advance. It's then off to work for that all important career while somebody else get's paid to raise her children and instill their moral values and choice's in to their kid's rather then themselve's. By the time mom pick's up baby/toddler she is just too exhausted from giving herself to others all day that cooking a decent meal for the family is just not an option. It's either frozen quick fixes or take out, at least most of the time. Time for the kid's? What time? Mom doesn't usually walk in the door until 5:30/6:00pm. She is physically wiped, mentally stressed, and spiritually sucked out. The last thing she wants is to deal with kid's hopping on her lap. This usually causes a verbal blast towards them about mom needing some time to herself. The kid's crime...wanting to spend time with her and share their exciting moments of the day. After supper it is bath time, a short story, and off to bed so mom can have her down time to recoup in order to give all her energies to other people the following day.

Where is the time for a relationship with your own children when a life is lived like this? What about the husband? I can only assure you that all of her stresses are "his fault" even if they really are not. This is what society calls a "successful" woman?

If this is the world view of a successful woman they can have her. I prefer my God's version..she is written about in Proverbs 31. She is my wife. Until next time...

Do as I do, NOT as I say!

It is already common knowledge to those of you who peruse my venomous writings that I am no fan of Liberal party's, thinker's, or way of life. But they are not alone in their twisted, deceptive, and self righteous way of thinking. There is yet another deluded mindset out there. They are known as the NDP (Nasty Defecit Party or my other fave, the No Damn Plan party). They lay claim to be the supporter's of a healthy and clean enviorment and big proponents of the Kyoto Accord. You know the accord don't you? The one where Canada is supposed to control it's toxic emission's only apparently we are failing miserably at it. We have signed this accord with the understanding that those who fail to reach their mandatory emission control targets must pay a heavy fine. However, they are allowed to buy "credits" from other nations who have signed onto the Kyoto agreement. Here is where it get 's really interesting...the other countries signed onto this agreement will never have to pay a single penny into the coffer's pot even if they far exceed their emission's limit. This is because they are third world nation's and will not be subject to financial penalty. Canada is the only country that will have to pay into it! Make's perfect sense does it not? The NDP slammed the U.S. Government for not signing on to this ridiculous accord and yet the US is not only meeting but far exceeding their own pollution control expectations, which have far stronger demands then Kyoto, making Canada look like a bunch of fool's. But what do you expect from a party that has prostituted itself to the Liberals time and again. These (NDP) are people who show up to their own press conferences in their gas guzzling SUV's telling us we need to be more conservative in our fuel consumption.

Their most recent display of typical adopted Liberal hypocrisy, came in the form of the same sex (Bill C-38) vote back in June 2005. This same party, which has also laid claim that they are the great purveyors of human rights and democratic reform, clearly displayed how far from the truth that statement actually is when it came down to this particular vote. While continually pointing accusing finger's at the Liberal Party for it's constant "confidence voting" imposed upon the party faithful (i.e. vote my way or it's the highway) the NDP turned and did EXACTLY the same thing by forcing the hand of their own party faithful to vote ONLY in favour of the bill or face consequence's. Party leader Jack(ass) Layton claimed that same sex marriage was a human rights issue and, because his party was such BIG supporter's of human rights, NDP MP's must vote in favour or face severe reprimand.

The problem with his arguement is that it has never been a human rights issue. Homosexuals have always had the right to marry...provided it was a member of the opposite sex. However, the RIGHT still existed. There was never a need to re-define marriage. Homosexuals have, for many years, enjoyed the same benefits as hetrosexual couples. What the NDP managed to accomplish thru this ridiculous vote on re-definition was, essentially, to remove the rights of some(marriage commissioners, clergy, etc.) ignore the will of the majority(68%) of Canadians who did not want marriage tampered with, and give them to a minority group of people(gays and lesbians) who never lost their rights in the first place.

Now we have a party in the NDP who DENIED it's own party members to exercise their fundamental right to freedom of moral conscience, which is gauranteed under the Charter of Human rights and freedom, in the House of Commons. They also denied their MP's to democratically represent the will of their constiuents. With the exception being NDP MP Bev Desjarlais who recognized this act of anti-democracy and bravely defied her party leader instead choosing to represent the will of the people who put her in office. She has since been stripped of her portfolio and most recently lost the vote to represent the NDP in her riding in the upcoming election.

Let's not forget Liberals either, who called it a free vote and then forced their 72 cabinet ministers to vote in favour. Once again calling it a "vote of confidence" while maintaining to the Canadian public that it was a "free vote" What???? So much for representing the will of the people and exercising democratic reform in the House of Commons.

Combined, these two parties are downright scary. Liberals swore up and down 12 years ago that same sex benefits to gay couples would NEVER lead to re-defineing the institution of marriage and yet here we are today. And they did it without a mandate from the Canadian public!!! We have the NDP who are supporter's of terroist's (see Svend Robinson in Palestine defending Yassar Arafrat) defenders of grand larceny(again see Svend Robinson "pocketing" a $60,000 ring apparently because he was distraught over a hiking incident 7 years ago? Whatever.) and adversaries against keeping the Christ in Christmas(once again, see Svend Robinson)



So what's next for these two hammer and sickle pusher's? Right now there are men out there who claim to feel more like a woman on the inside but have no desire to "alter" themselves physically. Should we then re-define the term woman to "include" the male anatomy so as not to offend or ostracize these people? Sounds ridiculous doesn't it? So was re-defining marriage. Keep voting in the communist dicator's and it will become reality. Until next time...

I am not an animal!

Imagine, if you will, how exactly you would feel if someone approached you and justified your sexuality to the equivalent of an animal. I don't know about you but I personally would be down right insulted. Yet here we are in the day and age of forced acceptance and "postive" tolerance(what a joke) being brought down to that level. Back in the spring(2005) when the whole gay marriage issue was being force fed down the throats of Canadians I took notice of a number of editorials and letter's to the editor(of a number of newspapers) rationalizing why the homosexual lifestyle should be welcomed into the fold of marriage. In a typical display of liberal idiocy, those in favour of gay marriage with their infinite wisdom felt comparison's to the animal kingdom was justification enough to accept homosexuality as a normal sexual lifestyle. The rationalisation given was simply this "...because the animals do it." Wow, how profound. Although I am not a homosexual, and I will NEVER recognize a same-sex marriage as legitimate, I did feel insulted on behalf of the gay community that there are people out there who, in defense of homosexuals, would lower them to the standard of an animal! At least I still recognize them as part of the human race and treat them as such. What these defender's of "goodwill" do not realise is the pandora's box that they are opening when they make such dangerous comparison's. If we are to accept the homosexual lifestyle as "normal" because "the animals do it" then one has to be prepared for acceptance of all the animals sexual practises and adopt them as normal for human's as well. Not just homosexuality. If we parallel our sexuality with animals here's what we are in danger of saying is acceptable.
1.) Animals DO NOT ask for permission to have sex with their partner. If we apply the term"..because the animals do it" we then justify non consensual sex or rape as an acceptable sexual lifestyle.
2.) Some animals kill their mate during the act. Because the animals do it we must now accept necrophilia as a normal sexual lifestyle.
3.) Monkeys, for example, have sex with their own children when they are as young as 2 years old. Because the animals do it we now say that incest and pedophileia is also a normal, therefore, acceptable sexual lifestyle.
4.) Some animals will kill another male species and take his female companion. Because the animals do it we must now accept that it is OK for a man to murder another man so he can take his wife for himself.
Are you begining to get the picture? The human race should always hold itself to a higher standard. The reason some animals engage in homosexual activity (listen up you liberal moron's who don't do your homework) is because of over population. It has nothing to do with a strong urge to be with the same sex. It has everything to do with an internal clock inside that goes off during certain times of the year that says I must pro create RIGHT NOW! It is almost as if their body instinctively takes over because they are being told they need to "release" their seed. Is it normal for them to engage with another animal of the same sex? No, it is because that is what is available to them. Unlike human beings who can exert self control, they cannot. My final case in point is this...when your neighbour's pooch run's across the street to mount you and furiously begin's to hump your leg do you:
A) Say to your self "I think this is the begining of a beautiful thing" or...
B.) Say to yourself "This is just NOT NORMAL!"
Think about it! Until next time...